Metagovernance and Democratic Legitimacy: a theoretical essay in light of non-market approaches
PDF (English)

Palavras-chave

Metagovernance
Market Non-market
Democracy
Government

Como Citar

Andrade, G. P. ., Andrade de Abreu, J. C. ., Santos, R. C. dos, & Khatib, S. F. A. . (2022). Metagovernance and Democratic Legitimacy: a theoretical essay in light of non-market approaches. RGC - Revista De Governança Corporativa, 9(1), e0116. https://doi.org/10.21434/IberoamericanJCG.v9i.116

Resumo

Purpose of the study: The aim of this study is to demonstrate why metagovernance is not effective in increasing the democratic legitimacy of networks; to this end, an articulated map will be presented to describe how interactions occur within metagoverned environments.

Methodology/approach: To construct the macro-model of analysis, the methodology of Quivy and Campenhoudt (2005) was used. To consolidate the knowledge involved in the theoretical approach, the Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist (Proknow-C) method by Ensslin, Dutra and Ensslin (2000)
was used. Such a proposal allowed a multidisciplinary perspective, capturing important concepts from economics and organizational theory to apply them to the meta-governed environment.

Originality/Relevance: Metagovernance systems suggest some ability to provide democratic plurality to a social environment, in that we need to understand "if" and "how" this applies; metagovernance is recent in academia and is under discussion; we need to understand its impact in countries with developing institutional environments.

Key findings: Metagoverned systems involve multiple players; difficulty of reconciliation raises transaction costs, both ex-ante - to achieve consensus in the network - and ex-post - when creating mechanisms to deal with disgruntled actors. Such a scenario leads key players to effect coalitions to 'narrow the road' to their own interests, and practice corporate political activity seeking to influence decision making. Actions will focus on impacting the public agent designated as metagovernor, in order to influence possible changes in the environment (regulation).

Theoretical/methodological contributions: An articulated map has been proposed, presenting the cycle of interactions within a metagoverned environment. It shows that sometimes the decisions taken are not the most democratic ones, but those of interest to coalitions.

Social contributions / to management: From a legitimacy perspective, it is necessary to understand how the outcome of networked decision-making can become more democratic, and how metagoverned environments can become less susceptible to harmful corporate political activity, especially in developing democracies.

https://doi.org/10.21434/IberoamericanJCG.v9i.116
PDF (English)

Referências

Albareda, L., & Waddock, S. (2018). Networked CSR governance: A whole network approach to meta-governance. Business & Society, v. 57, n. 4, p. 636-675.

Ayres, S. (2014). Place-based leadership: Reflections on scale, agency and theory. Regional Studies, Regional Science, v. 1, n. 1, 21–24.

Ayres, S., Sandford, M., & Coombes, T. (2017). Policy-making ‘front’ and ‘back’ stage: Assessing the implications for effectiveness and democracy. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, v. 19. N. 4, p. 861-876.

Back, D., & Allen, D. B. (2010). What every CEO needs to know about nonmarket strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, v. 51, n. 2, p. 40-49.

Bakker, F., Groenewegen, P., & Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years or research and theory on corporate social responsibility and Corporate Social Performance. Business & Society, v. 44, n. 3, p. 283-317.

Barbosa, C. P. (2019). Economia da Estratégia. In: Abdalla et al (Org). Administração Estratégica. 1. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, p. 199-219.

Barley, S. R. (2010). Building an Institutional Field to Corral a Government: A Case to Set an Agenda for organization studies.

Organization Studies, v. 31, p. 777-805.

Baron, D. P. (1995). Integrated Strategy: Market and Nonmarket Components. Califórnia Management Review, v. 37, n. 2, p. 47-65.

Barron, A. (2010). Unlocking the mindsets of Government Affairs Managers: Cultural dimensions of corporate political activity.

Cross Cultural Management: an International Journal, v. 17, n. 2, p. 101-117.

Barron, A. (2011). Exploring national culture's consequences on international business lobbying. Journal of World Business, v. 46, n. 3, p. 320-327.

Bator, F. M. (1958). The Anatomy of Market Failure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 72, n. 3, p. 351-379.

Bekker, M. C. (2014). Project Governance: 'Schools of Thought". South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, v. 17, n. 1, p. 22-32.

Bernanke, B., & Kuttner, K. (2005). What explains the Stock Market´s Reaction to Federal Reserve Policy? The Journal of Finance, v. LX, n. 3, p. 1221-1257.

Bourdieu, P. (2005). Principles of an Economic Anthropology. In: Smelser, N. J., & Swedberg, R. (Ed.). The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2a ed., p. 75-89.

Bogason, P., & Musso, J. (2006). The Democratic Prospects of Network Governance. American Review of Public Administration, v. 36, n. 1, p. 3-18.

Buchanan, J., & Tullock, G. (1965). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. 3. ed. Indianápolis: Liberty Fund.

Campos, H. A. (2008). Falhas de Mercado e falhas de governo: uma revisão de literatura sobre regulação econômica. Prismas: Direito, Políticas Públicas e Mundialização, v. 5, p. 281-303.

Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construction. Business & Society, v.38, n.3, p.268-295.

Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law & Economics, v. 3, p. 1-44.

Costa, A. S. M., & Abdalla, M. (2019). Atividade Política Corporativa. In: Abdalla et al. (Org.). Administração Estratégica. 1. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, p. 177-198.

Curi, D. P. (2019). Responsabilidade Social Corporativa e Estratégia. In: Abdalla et al. (Org.). Administração Estratégica. 1. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, p. 177-198.

Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.

Dutra, A., Ripool-Feliu, V. M. R., Fillol, A. G., Ensslin, S. R., & Ensslin, L. (2015). The construction of knowledge from the scientific literature about the theme seaport performance evaluation. The International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, v. 64, n. 2, p. 243-269.

Eberlein, B. (2019). Who fills the global governance gap? Rethinking the roles of business and government in global governance. Organization Studies, v. 40, 1125–1145.

Ensslin, L., Dutra, A., & Ensslin, S. R. (2000). MCDA: A constructivist approach to the management of human resources at a Governmental Agency. International Transactions in Operational Research - ITORS, v. 7, p. 79-100.

Entwistle, T., Bristow, G., Hines, F., Donaldson, S., & Martin, S. (2007). The dysfunctions of markets, hierarchies and networks in the meta-governance of partnership. Urban Studies, v. 44, n. 1, p. 63-79.

Eshuis, J., & Van Buuren, A. (2014). Innovations in water governance: the importance of time. International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 80, n. 2, p. 401-420.

Evans, B. (2007). The Politics of Partnership: Urban Regeneration in New East Manchester. Public Policy and Administration, v. 22, n 2, p. 201–215.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Discurso e Mudança Social. Traduzido por Izabel Magalhães. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília.

Fernandes, D. (2019). Na França, acordo entre UE e Mercosul enfrenta oposição e protestos de agricultores, ambientalistas e até ministros. BBC. Paris, 7 jul. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/internacional-48845254

Fligstein, N., & Dauter, L. (2012). The Sociology of Markets. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 33, p. 105-128. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ge, L., & Brewster, C. A. (2016). Informational institutions in the agrifood sector: meta-information and meta-governance of environmental sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, v. 18, p. 73-81.

Gjaltema, J., Biesbroek, R., & Termeer, K. (2019). From government to governance… to metagovernance: a systematic literature review. Public Management Review, v. 22, n. 12, p. 1760-1780.

Hayek, F. A. (1990). O caminho da servidão. Tradução de Anna Maria Capovilla, José Ítalo Stelle e Liane de Morais Ribeiro, 5ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Liberal.

Hayek, F. A. (2011). Desemprego e política monetária. Tradução de Francisco Leme, 2ª ed. São Paulo: Instituto Mises Brasil.

Hayek, F. A. (1985). A. Direito, Legislação e Liberdade. Tradução de Henry Maksoud, 1. ed. Goiânia: Editora Visão.

Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1998). Globalização em Questão: A Economia Internacional e as Possibilidades de Governabilidade. Petrópolis: Vozes.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences – International Differences in Work-Related Values. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Holmen, A. K. T. (2011). Governance Networks in City-regions: In the Spirit of Democratic Accountability? Public Policy and Administration, v. 26, n. 4, p. 399-418.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure.

Journal of Financial Economics, v. 3, n. 4, p. 305-360.

Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, v. 50, n. 155, p. 29–46.

Jevons, W. S. (1965). The theory of political economy. New York: Sentry Press.

Kar-Gupta, S., & Trompiz, G. (2019). Agricultores da França revoltados com acordos depredam escritórios de parlamentares.

Reuters. França, 8 ago. 2019. Disponível em: https://br.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idBRKCN1UY22O-OBRWD

Klakegg, O. J., Williams, T., Magnussen, O. M., & Glasspool, H. (2008). Governance frameworks for public project development and estimation. Project Management Journal, v. 39, n. S1, p. 27-42.

Keynes, J. M. (1996). A Teoria Geral do Emprego, do Juro e da Moeda. Tradução de Mário R. da Cruz, 6ª ed. São Paulo: Editora Nova Cultural.

Klijn, E. H., & Teisman, G. R. (2003). Institutional and strategic barriers to public–private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases. Public Money & Management, v. 23, n. 3, p. 137–146.

Kwak, Y. H., Chih, Y. Y., & Ibbs, C. W. (2009). Towards a comprehensive understanding of public–private partnerships for infrastructure development. California Management Review, v. 51, n. 2, p. 51–78.

Li, B., Akintoye, A., Edwards, P. J. & Hardcastle, C. (2005). Critical success factors for PPP/PFI projects in the UK construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, v. 23, n. 5, p. 459–471.

Loch, M., & Gunther, H. F. (2015). Estratégias de não mercado: uma revisão integrativa. Revista de Administração FACES Journal, v. 14, n. 1, p. 88-94, jan./mar.

Mankiw, N.G. Introdução à Economia. 6ª Edição. São Paulo: Cengage, 2013.

O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do texto na da revista;

O(s) autor(es) garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);

A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);

É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder a ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação.

Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Esta licença permite que outros remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do seu trabalho para fins não comerciais, e embora os novos trabalhos tenham de lhe atribuir o devido crédito e não possam ser usados para fins comerciais, os usuários não têm de licenciar esses trabalhos derivados sob os mesmos termos.

Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) emhttp://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html