Product Innovation: Path to Sustainable Competitive Advantage with Use of Environmental, Social and Governance Principles
Palavras-chave:Product Innovation, Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Furniture Industry, Structural Equation Modeling, Social and Governance Principles
Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the relationship between product innovation and strategic resources used by the furniture enterprises, under the perspective of sustainable competitive advantage, with the intention to identify the resources previous to innovation.
Methodology/approach: The method used in this research is a quantitative and descriptive study, through a survey, applied to 1067 companies in Brazilian furniture industry. The data analysis occurred through Structural Equation Modeling.
Originality/Relevance: Product innovation and strategic resources are capable of providing great potential for economic transformation. It is strategically acknowledged that there is a relationship between product innovation and the use of resources, however, there are as yet insufficient empirical studies to determine which resources influence product innovation. Another important aspect is to evaluate the influence of Environmental, Social and Governance sustainability precepts in the development of new products.
Key findings: In the empirical study, noticed that Product Innovation results from the use of resources, which configures innovation antecedents.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: This study contributes the advancement of science, which can be used to analyze the antecedents of Product Innovation, which pointed out that companies with strategic resources can expand the capacity of innovation by generating sustainable Product Innovation, which leads to the success of a new product.
Social contributions/to management: This study can contribute to managerial decisions, as the results indicate that the Success in New Product Development proved to be an essential form of competitive advantage, comparing the results of Product Innovation with competitors and relating this performance to the use of Environmental, Social and Governance principles.
Alonso, I.A., Verdun, J.C. & Caro, E.T. (2010). Information technology to help drive business innovation and growth. In Sobh, T. and Elleithy, K (Eds)., Innovations and advanced techniques in systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering. Springer, p. 527-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9112-3_90
Armstrong, M. (2009). Armstrongs Handbook of Human Resource Management practice. 11 ed., Kogan Page, London.
Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1991). Multitrait–multimethod matrices in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, v.17, n.4, p. 426-439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/208568
Baker, J. & Sinkula, W. (1999). The synergetic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, v. 27, n. 4, p. 411-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399274002
Barney, J. (1991a). Special theory forum: the resource-based model of the firm: origins, implications, and prospects, Journal of Management, v. 17 n. 1, p. 97-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700107
Barney, J. (1991b). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, v. 17, n. 1, p. 99-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Barney, J. (1996). The resource-based theory of the firm. Organization Science, v. 7, n. 5, p. 469-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.469
Barney, J. & Hesterly, W. (1996). Organizational economics: understanding the relationship between organizations and economic analysis. In: Clegg, S.R.; Hardy, C.; Nord, W.R. (ed.). Handbook of organization studies. Sage Publications, London.
Beauvallet, G. & Houy, T. (2010). Research on HRM and lean management: a literature survey, The International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, v. 10, n. 1, p. 14-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2010.029444
Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural equations, Psychological Bulletin, v. 107, n. 2, p. 238-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Besanko, D., Dranove, D., Shanley, M. & Schaefer, S. (2007). Economics of strategy. (4nd ed.)., John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Bharadwaj, A.S.A. (2000). Resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly, v. 24, n. 1, p. 169-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
Blyler, M. & Coff, R.W. (2003). Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: ties that split pies, Strategic Management Journal, v. 24, n. 7, p. 677-686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.327
Brandenburger, A.M & Stuart Jr.H.W. (1996). Value-based business strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, v. 5, n. 1, p. 5-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1996.00005.x
MOVERGS (2022). Associação das Indústrias de Móveis do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. https://www.movergs.com.br/dados-setor-moveleiro (accessed in June 2022).
Brumagim, A.L. (1994). A hierarchy of corporate resources. In.; Shrivastava, P.; Huff, A. S.; Dutton, J. E (Eds). Advances in Strategic Management, v. 10, JAI Press: Greenwich, p. 81-112.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, 2nd ed., Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
Cardinal, L.B.A., Turner, S.F.B., Fern, M.J.C. & Burton, R.M. (2011). Organizing for product development across technological environments: performance trade-offs and priorities. Organization Science, v.22, n.4, p. 1000-1025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0577
Chang, S., Van Witteloostuijn, A. & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, v.41, n.2, p. 178-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.88
Chen, C-J & Huang, J-W. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance – the mediating role of knowledge management capacity, Journal of Business Research, v. 62, p. 104-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.11.016
Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Conant, J.S., Smart, D.T., & Solano-Mendez, R. (1993). Generic retailing types, distinctive marketing competencies and competitive advantage. Journal of Retailing, vol.69, n.3, p. 254-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4359(93)90008-7
Cooper, R. G. (1994). New products: the factors that drive success, International Marketing Review, v.11, n.1, p. 60-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339410057527
Decarolis, D.M. & Deeds, D. (1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry, Strategic Management Journal, v.20, p. 953-968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199910)20:10<953::AID-SMJ59>3.0.CO;2-3
De Guimarães, J.C.F., Severo, E.A., Dorion, E.C.H., Coallier, F. & Olea, P.M. (2016). The use of organizational resources for product innovation and organizational performance: a survey of the brazilian furniture industry, International Journal of Production Economics, v.180, p. 135-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.018
De Guimarães, J.C.F., Severo, E.A. & Vieira, P.S. (2017). Cleaner production, project management and strategic drivers: an empirical study, Journal of Cleaner Production, v.141, p. 881-890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.166
De Guimarães, J. C. F., Severo, E. A., Jabbour, C. J. C., De Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Rosa, A. F. P., 2021. The journey towards sustainable product development: why are some manufacturing companies better than others at product innovation?. Technovation, v. 103, p. 102239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102239
Davenport, T.H. (1993). Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Donate, M.J. & Guadamillas, F. (2011). Organizational factors to support knowledge management and innovation, Journal of Knowledge Management, v.1, n.6, p. 890-914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179271
Earl, M. (2001). Knowledge management strategies: toward a taxonomy, Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 18, n. 1, p. 215-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045670
Eisenhardt K.M. & Martin J.A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: why are they?, Strategic Management Journal, v. 21, n. 10/11, p. 1105-1121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Elmuti D. & Kathawala Y. (2001). An overview of strategic alliances, Management Decision, v. 39, n. 3, p. 205-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005452
Fabrigar, L.R., Porter, R.D. & Norris, M.E. (2010). Some things you should know about structural equation modeling but never thought to ask, Journal of Consumer Psychology, v. 20, n. 2, p. 221-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.03.003
Fiergs – Federation of Industries of state Rio Grande do Sul, (2018). Industrial Registry of Rio Grande do Sul, https://www.fiergs.org.br (accessed in March 2018).
Firjan – Federation of Industries of state Rio de Janeiro, (2018). http://www.firjan.org.br/data/pages/2C908CE9234D9BDA01234E532B007D5D.htm (accessed in March 2018)..
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. (1982). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurements error, Journal of Marketing Research, v. 17, n. 1, p. 39-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Garavelli, C., Gorgoglione, M, & Scozzi, B. (2004). Knowledge management strategy and organization: a perspective of analysis, Knowledge and Process Management, v. 11, n. 4, p. 273-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.209
Garcia, R. & Calantone R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review, Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 19, p. 110-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1920110
Gemünden, H.G., Ritter, T. & Heydebreck, P. (1996). Network Configuration and innovation success: an empirical analysis in German high-tech industries, International Journal of Research in Marketing, v. 13, p. 449-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(96)00026-2
Godard, J. & Delaney J.T. (2000). Reflections on the high performance paradigms implications for industrial relations as a field, Industrial and labor Relations Review, v. 53, n. 3, p. 482-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390005300307
Goldenberg, J.A.B., Han, S.C., Lehmann, D.R.D. & Hong, J.W.E. (2009). The role of hubs in the adoption process, Journal of Marketing, v. 73, n. 2, p. 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.2.1
Gold, A.H., Malhotra, A. & Segars, A.H. (2001). Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 18, n. 1, p. 185-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
Grant, R.M. (1996). Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, v. 17, p. 109-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
Guan, J. & Ma, N. (2003). Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms, Technovation, v. 23, n. 12, p. 737–747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00013-5
Guimarães, J.C.F. (2013). The Relationship Between Strategic Resources and Product Innovation to Achieve Competitive Advantage in the Furniture Industry Companies. Unpublished Doctorate thesis, Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS). and the University of Caxias do Sul (UCS)., Caxias do Sul, Brazil.
Gupta, A. & Thomas, G. (2001). Organizational learning in a high-tech environment: from theory to practice, Industrial Management & Data Systems, v. 101, n. 9, p. 502-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570110410690
Hafeez, K., Zhang, Y. B. & Malak, N. (2002). Core competence for sustainable competitive advantage: a structured methodology for identifying core competence, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, v. 49, n. 1, p. 28-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/17.985745
Hair Jr. J. F., Black, W. C., Bardin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. 2014. Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. 7th ed. Pearson Education Limited, New York.
Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C.K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review, may./jun.
Han, J.K., Kim, N. & Srivastava, R.K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link?, Journal of Marketing, v. 62, n. 4, p. 30-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200403
Harabi, N. (1998). Innovation through vertical relations between firms, suppliers and customers: a study of German firms, Industry and Innovation, v. 5, n. 2, p. 157-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719800000009
Hayati, D, Karami, E. & Slee, B. (2006). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in the measurement of rural poverty, Social Indicators Research, v. 75, p. 361-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-6299-9
Heide, J.B. & John. G. (1990). Alliances in industrial purchasing: the determinants of joint action in buyer-supplier relationships, Journal of Marketing Research, v. 27, Feb., p. 24-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379002700103
Hoffman, N.P. (2000). An examination of the “sustainable competitive advantage” concept: past, present, and future, Academy of Marketing Science Review, v. 2000, n. 4, p. 1-16.
Hohl, H., Bocker, H.D. & Gunzenhauser, R. (1996). Hypadapter: an adaptive hypertext system for exploratory learning and programming, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, v. 6, n. 2/3, p. 131-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143965
Hoyle, R.H. & Panter, A.T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.)., Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, p. 158-176.
Huizingh, E.K.R.E. (2011). Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives, Technovation, v. 31, n. 1, p. 2-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
Hung, S.W., Tsai, J.M., Cheng, M.J. & Chen P.C. (2012). Analysis of the development strategy of late-entrants in Taiwan and Koreas TFT-LCD industry, Technology in Society, v. 34, p. 9-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.12.001
Hunt, S.D. & Morgan R.M. (1995). The comparative advantage theory of competition, Journal of Marketing, v. 59, Apr., p. 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299505900201
Huselid, M. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance, Academy of Management Journal, v. 40, n. 1, p. 171-88.
Inkpen, A.C. & Pien, W. (2006). An examination of collaboration and knowledge transfer: China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park. Journal of Management Studies, v. 43, n. 4, p. 779-811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00611.x
Iriondo, J.M., Albert, M.J. & Escudero A. (2003). Structural equation modeling: an alternative for assessing causal relationships in threatened plant populations, Biological Conservation, v. 113, p. 367-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00129-0
Kale, P. & Singh, H. (2007). Building firm capabilities through learning: the role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success, Strategic Management Journal, v. 28, n.10, p. 981-1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.616
Kandemir, D., Calantone, R. & Garcia R. (2006). An exploration of organizational factors in new product development success, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, v. 21, n. 5, p. 300-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620610681605
Khandekar, A. & Sharma, A. (2005). Managing human resource capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage: an empirical analysis from Indian global organizations, Education and Training, v. 47, n. 8, p. 628-639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910510633161
Kim, S. & Lee, H. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge-sharing capability, Public Administration Review, May/June, p. 370-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00595.x
Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. The Guilford Press, New York.
Kleinschmidt, E.J. & Cooper, R.G. (1991). The impact of product innovativeness on performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 8, n. 4, p. 240-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.840240
Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and replication of technology, Organization Science, v. 3, n. 3, p. 383-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
Kohli, A.K. & Jaworski, B. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications, Journal of Marketing, v. 54, n. 2, p. 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400201
Kohli, A.K., Jaworski, B.J. & Kumar, A. (1993). Markor: a measure of market orientation, Journal of Marketing Research, v. 30, n. 4, p. 467-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379303000406
Lambe, C.J., Spekman, R.E. & Hunt, S.D. (2002). Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: conceptualization, measurement, and initial test, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, v. 30, n. 2, p. 141-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03079459994399
Lee, N. & Hooley, G. (2005). The evolution of “classical mythology” within marketing measure development, European Journal of Marketing, v. 39, n. 3/4, p. 365-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560510581827
Leidner, D., Alavi, M. & Kayworth, T. (2006). The role of culture in knowledge management: a case study of two global firms, International Journal of e-Collaboration, v. 2, n. 1, p. 17-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jec.2006010102
Liu, C-C., Chiang, S-H.F. Chou, C-Y. & Chen, S.Y. (2010). Knowledge exploration with concept association techniques, Online Information Review, v. 34, n. 5, p. 786-805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011084627
Lorenzoni, G. & Lipparini, A. (1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study, Strategic Management Journal, v. 20, n. 4, p. 317-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199904)20:4<317::AID-SMJ28>3.0.CO;2-3
March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, v. 2, n. 1, p. 71-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Mardia, K.V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications, Biometrika, v. 36, p. 519-530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
Mardia, K.V. (1971). The effect of nonnormality on some multivariate tests and robustness to nonnormality in the linear model, Biometrika, v. 58, n. 1, p. 105-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/58.1.105
Marôco, J., 2010. Análise de equações estruturais: fundamentos teóricos, softwares & aplicações. PSE, Lisboa.
Maruyama, G.M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Sage Publications, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483345109
Mcgrath, R. G., Tsai, M., Venkataraman, S. & Macmillan, I.C. (1996). Innovation, competitive advantage and rent: a model and test. Management Science, v. 42, n. 3, p. 389-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.3.389
Mehta, N. (2008). Successful knowledge management implementation in global software companies, Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 12, n. 3, p. 42-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810859505
Nambisan, S. (2003). Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development, MIS Quarterly, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036517
Narver, J. C. & Slater, S. F. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization, Journal of Marketing, v. 59, p. 63-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1252120
Nezam, M.H.K., Attafar, A., Isfahani, A.N. & Shahin, A. (2013). Human capital and new product development performance efficiency: the mediating role of organizational learning capability, International Journal of Learning and Development, v. 3, n. 3, p. 40-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v3i6.4564
Nieto, M.J. & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation, Technovation, v. 27, n. 6-7, p. 367–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.001
Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creating company, Harvard Business Review, Nov/Dec, p. 96-104.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, v. 5, n. 1, p. 14-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
OECD (2005). The measurement of scientific and technological activities – Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Oslo manual. 3rd ed. OECD and Eurostat, Paris.
Orlikowski, W.J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, v.11, n.4, p. 404-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
O´Connor, G.C., Hendricks, R. & Rice, M.P. (2002). Assessing transition readiness for radical innovation, Research Technology Management, v. 45, n. 6, p. 50-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2002.11671533
Oxley, J.E. & Sampson, R.C. (2004). The scope and governance of international R&D alliances, Strategic Management Journal, v. 25, n. 8/9, p. 723-749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.391
Paladino, A. (2007). Investigating the drivers of innovation and new product success: a comparison of strategic orientations, Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 24, p. 534-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00270.x
Patanakul, P. A., Chen, J. B. & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Autonomous teams and new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v.29, n.5, p. 734-750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00934.x
Pavlou, P.A. & El Sawy, O.A. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: the case of new product development, Information Systems Research, v. 17, n. 3, p. 198-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0094
Phelps, C.A., Heidl, R.B. & Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, v.38, n.4, p. 1115-1166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311432640
Pil, F.K. & Cohen, S.K. (2006). Modularity: implications for imitation, innovation, and sustained advantage. Academy of Management Review, v.31, n.4, p. 995-1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22528166
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J. & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003)., Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, v.88, n.5, p. 879-903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Porter, M. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy, Strategic Management Journal, v. 12, p. 95-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121008
Poulymenakou, A. & Prasopoulou, E. (2004). Adopting a lifecycle perspective to explain the transition from technological innovation to alliance management, Management Decision. v. 42, n. 9, p. 1115-1130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740410565154
Powell, T.C. & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources, Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, n. 5, p. 375-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<375::AID-SMJ876>3.0.CO;2-7
Prieto, I.M, Revilla, E. & Rodríguez-Prado, B. (2009). Managing the knowledge paradox in product development, Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 13, n. 3, p. 157-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910962941
Ravichandran, T. & Lertwongsatien, C. (2005). Effect of information system resources and capabilities on firm performance: a resource-based perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 21, n. 4, p. 237-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820
Rieman, J. (1996). A field study of exploratory learning strategies, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, v. 3, n. 3, p. 189-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/234526.234527
Rigdon, E.E. (1999). Structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides, G. Modern methods for business research, LEA, New Jersey, p. 251-294.
Ritter, H.G. & Gemünden, H.G. (2003). Network competence: its impact on innovation success and its antecedents, Journal of Business Research, v.56, n. 9, p. 745-755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00259-4
Sanchez, R. (1995). Strategic flexibility in product competition, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 16, p. 135-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160921
Schneider, B. & Bowen, D.E. (1985). Employee and customer perceptions of service in banks: replication and extension, Journal of Applied Psychology, v.17, p. 423-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.423
Severo, E.A., Guimarães, J.C.F. & Dorion, E.C.H. (2017). Cleaner production and environmental management as sustainable product innovation antecedents: A survey in Brazilian industries, Journal of Cleaner Production. v.142, p. 87-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.090
Severo, E.A., Guimarães, J.C.F. & Dorion, E.C.H. (2018). Cleaner production, social responsibility and eco-innovation: Generations perception for a sustainable future, Journal of Cleaner Production. v.186, p. 91-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.129
Sivadas, E. & Dwyer, F.R. (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes, Journal of Marketing, v. 64, n. 1, p. 31-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.188.8.131.5285
Sharma, R., Yetton, P. & Crawford, J. (2009). Estimating the effect of common method variance: the method-method pair technique with an illustration from TAM research. MIS Quarterly, v.33, n.3, p. 473-490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20650305
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Developmental. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Slater, S. F. & Narver, J. C. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation performance relationship? Journal of Marketing, v.58, n.1, p. 46-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800104
Song, X.M., Mitzi, M-W & Schmidt, J.B. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of cross functional cooperation: a comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives, Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 14, Jan., p. 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1410035
Spender, J-C. & Grant, R.M. (1996). Knowledge and the firm: overview, Strategic Management Journal, v. 17, Winter Special Issue, p. 5-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171103
Subramaniam, M. & Youndt, M. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities, Academy of Management Journal, v. 48, n. 3, p. 450-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407911
Tanaka, J.S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions on fit in structural equations modeling. In: Bollen, K.A. & Long, J.S. (Eds). Testing structural equation models. Sage, Newbury Park, p. 10-39.
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, p. 509-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tippins, M.J. & Sohi, R.S. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link?, Strategic Management Journal, v. 24, p. 745-761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.337
Ulrich, D., Halbrook, R., Meder, D. & Stuchlik, M. (1991). Employee and customer attachment: synergies for competitive advantage, Human Resource Planning, v. 14, n. 2, p. 89-102.
Varadarajan, R.P. & Cunningham, M.H. (1995). Strategic alliances: a synthesis of conceptual foundations, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, v. 23, n. 4, p. 297-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300408
Wright, P., Mcmahan, G., Mccormick, B. & Sherman, S. (1998). Strategy, core competence, and human resource involvement as determinants of HR effectiveness and refinery performance, Human Resource Management, v. 36, p. 17-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199821)37:1<17::AID-HRM3>3.0.CO;2-Y
Yang, J-T. (2007). Knowledge sharing: investigating appropriate leadership roles and collaborative culture, Tourism Management, v. 28, p. 530-543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.08.006
Zack, M., Mckeen, J. & Singh, S. (2009). Knowledge management and organizational performance: an exploratory survey, Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 13, n. 6, p. 392-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910997088
Zhang, M. J. (2007). An empirical assessment of the performance impacts of IS support for knowledge transfer, International Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 3, n. 1, p. 66-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jkm.2007010105
Zhang, M.J. (2011). Firm-level performance impact of IS support for product innovation, European Journal of Innovation Management, v. 14, n. 1, p. 118-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061111104724
Zollo, M. & Winter, S.G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, Organization Science, v. 13, n. 3, p. 339-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do texto na da revista;
O(s) autor(es) garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, idéias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder a ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação.
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Esta licença permite que outros remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do seu trabalho para fins não comerciais, e embora os novos trabalhos tenham de lhe atribuir o devido crédito e não possam ser usados para fins comerciais, os usuários não têm de licenciar esses trabalhos derivados sob os mesmos termos.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) emhttp://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html